Argument for the Abolishment of the Death Penalty

Argument for the Abolishment of the dying penalizationAlvin Soo expiry penalization is the majuscule punishment that has authorization to kill soulfulness as the plagues punishment. The first country that started the end punishment is Babylon. It established the finis penalisation fairness at eighteenth century. there ar some methods of finale penalization that develop over the centuries such as shooting, poisoning, hanging, and separates. In the modern century, there be many countries are apply the demolition punishment in the law punishment such as Malaysia, China, and others. fit in to the website, theguardian, China has the most number of flock sentenced to cobblers last and its most car park death penalization method is shooting. The manslayers eyes are groked and their clog is facing the shooter. Then the shooters leave alone start firing until the murderers are dead. wipeout penalty has been a popular discussion since some countries are pickings t he lead to abolish death penalty. People are debating whether the death penalty should be abolished. In this era, death penalty need to be abolished from the law because it has negative effects on parliamentary procedure, family, and economy.First of all, death penalty is support the racial discrimination. According to the expiration Penalty Information Center, most of the death punishments are sentenced to the minority tends such as African-American. It is a norm that the gild has racial discrimination because wad like to be in a group, which has people of similar race or purification. When there is an outsider that doesnt flummox similarity, they leave behind neglect that outsider and may treat him diametricly. This is not h superstarst happening in the society it alike happens in court. When the judge and control board are making decision in front of the justice, they are motionlessness having bias when deciding the punishment because every oneness has prejudice and discrimination. Based on NAACP shepherds crook Justice Department (2017), the death penalty go out affect the victims race especially white. This proves that the death penalty is supporting the racial discrimination.Secondly, death penalty is not eliminating the shifting from the society. In the modern society, everyone is meliorate to follow the rules to fend off from broadcastting the crime. However, everyone is not educated to be forgiving sin. Although crimes happened, the murderers are deserved to be impartn another chance to change their bad behavior and thinking. The devious cannot be stopped by killing the murderers. Instead, the murderers needed be educated in prison to gain the forgiveness and decrease the crime rate. excessively that, death penalty also increases the crime rate. Originally, death penalty is employ to discourage the people committing crime by making them scare because one of the humans fears is death. remnant penalty also can save other lives by eliminated the people who attached crime but it doesnt help to diminish the crime rate. Article by Bonner and Fessenden (2000) supports that the states that brace no death penalty are having lower of slaughter rate. This is because the death penalty is replaced by culture and religion.Thirdly, death penalty is having negative effect on moral ethnicity. clean ethnicity is teaching about the principle of moral. It lets people know that everyone is equal and they are given the same human right even though they committed crime. However, death penalty is giving the wrong ethnicity to the society and family. It is promoting a concept, which the murderers are deserved to have deaths sentence because they committed crime. When that concept is spread into the society, the people pass on be submitd and may cause to a greater extent crime happens. The crusade is because people will choose to do the death sentence to the murderer without authorization and legal process. In the other hand , it is not right to pledge over other people invigoration no matter who they are. assassinate people are against the law death sentence is also slaughtering people. The sole(prenominal) difference between these two is on is illegal and other one is legal. In the view of morality, both are the same because killing people is an amorality.Fourthly, death penalty is impacting the family education negatively. Family is an important thing in behavior because everything is started from that first. If death penalty is not abolished, the children will become more primitive with aggressive family education. As mentioned above, death penalty will affect the society and family. If the perspective of death penalty can regulate the society and family. There will be more aggressive family appears and cause the violent crime arise. For an example, if children are having the aggressive punishment because they did the non-moral things like stealing, fighting, and others. Are the parents going to sound out that they are deserve to have that punishment? Definitely no, because parents have the office to let the children know that whats wrong with that attitude and admit it instead of using the extreme and aggressive punishment to make them afraid.Moreover, death penalty is also affecting the family to be broken. When the murders are sentenced to death, their families are going to be the victim. Death penalty is going to bring the unhappiness to the murderers family and cause the family falls by eventually. When one of the family members is executed, the rest are going to have tough life especially children. If the children dont have their parents in their childhood, they are more likely to commit crime when they grow up. Based on the news that written by Steve Doughty, the incomplete familys children more likely to fall into the society devious. This proves that the death penalty can cause negative effect on family.In addition, death penalty will also affect the country. Death penalty will give the country bad impression. A mentioned in introduction, death penalty is already existed in 18th century. This law is old and not effectual to control the safety of country. Instead, government should use other law to replace the death penalty. If the country can abolish the death penalty, it will give a good impression to the international society. That will cause the blood between the country become better. When there is a country victorious the lead to abolish the death penalty, the other countries in the international community will follow it. This will encourage the countries to have globalisation at heart each other. Globalization is the process that the organization develop international order such as international administer. Country can use the globalization to make its economy become better. It can use international trade to export the produced goods and services. This will increase the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which is the countrys economy.Death penalty is also costly to the government expenses. According to Chammah(2014), cost of capital punishment is increasing because the wage is increasing. The government needs to pack the worker to in charge of the death penalty. This recruitment is not just hire one worker. Instead, government is going to hire a group of people. Therefore, this will cause the government expenses to increase. When the government needs to find more resources to cover the expense. It will either increase the tax or decrease the other expenses. Increasing taxes will increase the burden of taxpayer and decrease the other expanses will decrease the benefit such as unemployment benefit. Both of this method will decrease the economy.In some peoples perspective, death penalty should be remained because the murderers have no right to decide whether they are sentenced to death. Lets think this in different view point. If one of the murderers is the family member, the perspective of death penalty will be different. The murderers family will appeal to the death penalty because it is too cruel to bourgeon away their lives. As the previous paragraph mentioned, everyone should be treated as same and have equal right. Therefore, death penalty should be eliminated from law.In conclusion, I agree and totally support to abolishment of death penalty because death penalty is negatively affecting the family, society, economy, and country. It is also having the bad influence on morality and culture. In order to make the children and countrys future better, death penalty have to be eliminated.ReferencesPart I History of the Death Penalty. (n.d.). Retrieved February 07, 2017, from http//www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/part-i-history-death-penaltyNAACP Death Penalty Fact Sheet. (2017, January 18). Retrieved February 07, 2017, from http//www.naacp.org/latest/naacp-death-penalty-fact-sheet/Bonner, R., Fessenden, F. (2000, September 21). ABSENCE OF EXECUTIONS A special report. States With No Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates. Retrieved February 07, 2017, from http//www.nytimes.com/2000/09/22/us/absence-executions-special-report-states-with-no-death-penalty-share-lower.htmlDoughty, S. (2008, October 21). Broken home children are tailfin times more likely to suffer mental troubles Broken home children are five times more likely to suffer mental troubles . Retrieved February 7, 2017, from http//www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1079510/Children-broken-homes-times-likely-suffer-mental-troubles-says-Government-study.htmlDieter, R.C. (1998). The Death of Penalty in America Current Controversies. H. A. Bedau (Ed.). Oxford, England Oxford University Press.