Judith Butler Response Essay Example for Free

Judith pantryman Response EssayJudith butlers Beside Oneself On the Limits of Sexual Autonomy is an natively philosophical essay that asks many moves that challenges the reviewer to cheek within themselves to search for their own interpretation of what they believe the answer to be. The first statement that butler opens with is, What makes for a livable world is no idol question. This statement almost seems like a question directed to the reader. I believe that nation interpret what they believe would make their lives bearable differently. What I may seem bearable for my own life may be unbearable to anformer(a)s. It is up to the individual to sink for themselves.Butler continues by saying, It becomes a question of ethics when some one from a position of power decides what makes other peoples lives bearable. To me, the question of what makes my own life bearable is my family. Other people may have different responses to that question. It is non up to one individual to d ecide for others what they privy live and raiset live without. I construe this concept to mean that no one should pronounce another soul who they should love or what can make their lives livable because it is different for all of us. There is no simple answer, therefore no one should be in the position to make out other people how to live their lives.Butler finds something in popular that we all shargon. We all grieve the lives of someone we have lost. We are all vulnerable to the pains and desires that our bodies nip for other bodies and we are all alike in that sense. Mourning is a feeling that everyone goes through when we overlook someone and we all go through it in different ways. No one can tell you how to mourn or what is the correct way to mourn just as no one should tell you what makes your life livable. We all experience emotional ties to feel a sense of self and once that is interpreted away we lose a part of ourselves. Butler claims that we undo each other or el se we are missing something.I agree that having close relationships with people make us weaker. We are vulnerable when our feelings get in the way of our judgments. We find ourselves wanting to protect our loved ones with our lives and wanting to make sacrifices for them that we otherwise would not make for strangers. That is also what makes human ties and bonds so special. We have the ability to love passionately and grieve deeply. These extreme emotions are what make us human and make our lives worth living. No one person can say they have superiority over another because they live their lives how they see fit and correct for everyone else.Butler goes on to say that crack is a way to view how we live besides ourselves. The notion of ecstasy is a way to describe our passion or grief. When politicians talk close rights for gays, lesbians and bisexuals, they are talking to the chemical group as bounded beings who all share the same distinct qualities. Yes, they share the same lif estyles, but to look at them as a whole excludes what makes each individual unique and what passions and hardships tears them from their being. Our bodies are how sexual practice and sexuality are revealed to others, but the categorizing of these specific groups of people excludes so much more information about them that we will never know.Butler is saying that we need to strive to get away from being subjected as just humans. This notion does not make much sense because our culture does not view this mood as a normal thought. In order to fully understand a group of people who have been stereotyped, you have to view each individual as not only human, but a being that houses a broad spectrum of emotions that leads to ecstasy that makes them feel beside themselves. There is so much to a person and we often find ourselves limiting their capabilities by subjecting them to a specific term. Butler is challenging the way nightspot views people who have been stereotyped by explaining tha t there is much more to any given person than meets the eye.