TOK: Subjective Nature of Perspective in Arts & Science

intimacy Issue To what extent may the prejudiced character of perception be regarded as an emolument for artificers however when an obstacle to be overcome by scientists? A person who produces mental pictures or drawings as a profession or hobby is called an Artist. All artists brace a way to express their art works. These expressions atomic number 18 usually recognized by unalike considerates of perspectives. whiz of the some common ways used to evaluate art works is through the essential character of perspective. When it comes to the word subjective, the relation of thoughts is automatically based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.Now, roughly artists take this technique as an advantage of manipulating/ provoking the viewers mind into liking their painting or any kind of artworks based on their the personal tastes. The wiz thing that helps them under stick up of the public interest is by generalization. We all recognise that opinions ar e mostly personal. plainly when it comes to society, our personal opinions do not real return in the public eye. The only few opinions that are veritable into the friendly world are the mavins set by the policy makers of society.These perspectives are mostly advertised through television or any kind of social networks that heeds the public. For this reason alone, people are blindly attracted by the social magnet to follow this so-called social quo. Without realizing, we as social butterflies, stand under the one who controls our strings in society. This functions perfectly for Artists, since they confirm the advantage to require the ultimate theme or setting for certain periods of date in society with the help of their subjective nature of perspective.This is proven over time Artists have created themes that develop from renaissance to abstract, to pop art, to post-modern art that we have today. Sometimes, some artists may decide to create something that no one else seems t o understand, but somehow got through in society. For example, in 1917, Marcel Duchamp signed a urinal with fake initials of R. Mutt and placed it in a museum. Without any special reason it became so popular in the public eye.One of the most probable reasons for this is because most people observe his artwork through the subjective nature of perspective, rather than combining it with the objective nature of perspective. As one opinion is made, it is then spread all over society make people to believe that this subjective opinion is the one they should have, hence the half mask effect. However, the subjective nature of perspective as well has a way of seemly an obstacle for some crowds in society. One group that struggles with this subjective nature of perspective is the Scientists.Scientists are people who are field of honoring or have expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences. Scientists have a hard time with the subjective nature of perspective, bec ause most of their annotations and analysis is based on the objectives, rather than the subjective stage of view. Their way of thinking is very firm and relates to the physical thing of things. They fathert depend on the mind for existence. This makes their judgment unbiased or impartial. This is why most of the scientific papers or reports have a certain rule for the experiments and data collection not to be biased.Their perspectives choose to have strong reasons to back up their opinions for certain outcome they state. They conciliate attention to personal judgments because it is what helps them elaborates methods and discoveries they made in their field. If one day, a unsanded scientist came along and he/ she decides to give a subjective statement during a scientist conference meeting, he/ she get out definitely be called out of the group because they have not successfully helped the group to decipher the missing voice to their scientific riddle. After all, science itself is the intellectual and practical activity.It encompasses the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation experiment. Therefore, scientists judgments are characterized by the methods and principles of science, meaning they have to avoid using the subjective nature of perspective since it does not relate to the physical and natural matter of things. In the end, its bias stop lead to a scientific misconduct. We can tell that these two groups are in contrast of each other. One is very focused with the emotional judgment, while the other focuses more on the physical matter of the judgment.They sum up the contrast of an un hardheaded and realistic world. When combined together, these two perspectives used by artists and scientists will only create a new theorem of a new world of perspective, which can only be understood by the viewers/ observers, because once our brains are familiarised with one nature of perspective (either subj ective or objective), we will fancy a hard time adjusting with other groups who have a different point of view to the world. Perspective itself afterwards is complicated at its foundation. facial expression from different angles with our naked eyes can be tough sometimes.But as feelings of emotions and factual existence correlate, possibilities of a better technique in different kinds of field will be made. This new theory also along with other works in different forms of arts (music, theatre) and fields of research. Creating an unrealistic imagery through a realistic interpretation will enable the viewers to engage deeply into the artwork. But is it possible for scientists to lend oneself the same theory in their field? So, is it possible for both artist and scientists to have a correlation between subjective and objective matter? After all, opposites do attract.